Our Unknown Ancient Past

In my book, Our Unknown Ancient Past , I included the world map of Herodotus, a map based on the descriptions of the ancient Greek historian, in reference to Atlantis. There, one can see the Atlas Mountain-range in the north-western edge of Africa. I would now like to discuss this map further, as it contains more interesting information. First of all, you can see the Indus River on the far right. This is important, as ancient Greeks were not supposed to know about the Indus River at the time of Herodotus. Alexander the Great reached India, but that was long after the time of Herodotus. This is further proof that the old stories of Dionysus and Hercules campaigning up to India are more than just stories, just like I argue in my book. In fact India was known to the Greeks al least since the time of Homer, as the great poet tells of the Ethiopians of the far east, opposite to the ones of Africa, taking it clear he was talking about the people of India. Secondly, you can not help but not...

"Destruction of Atlantis by a great earthquake and tsunami? A geological analysis of the Spartel Bank hypothesis", this is the title of a research paper by the Research Director of the "French National Centre for Scientific Research". Quite an eye-opener I would dare say, as the paper examines the geological plausibility of the Atlantis story, based on geological evidence. The paper starts by stating: "Numerous geographical similarities exist between Plato’s descriptions of Atlantis and a paleoisland (Spartel) in the western Straits of Gibraltar. The dialogues recount a catastrophic event that submerged the island ca. 11.6 ka in a single day and night, due to violent earthquakes and floods. This sudden destruction is consistent with a great earthquake (M . 8.5) and tsunami, as in the Gulf of Cadiz region in 1755 when tsunami runup heights reached 10 m. Great earthquakes (M 8–9) and tsunamis occur in the Gulf of Cadiz with a repeat time of 1.5–2 k.y., according...

There was once an island right next to the Straits of Gibraltar, from the side of the Atlantic. That island sunk approximately 12.000 years ago, around 10.000 BC. And most importantly, all this has been scientifically proven. No, I am not talking about Atlantis, but rather about Spartel island . A paleoisland that sunk around the same time as Atlantis, which according to Plato was around 9.600 BC. So, at the same period with the sinking of Atlantis, we now know for a fact that there was another - smaller - island in the Atlantic, close to the Gibraltar Straits, that sunk. What an amazing coincidence to add to our pile of countless coincidences that prove Plato was telling the truth all along. Something major happened back then to sink Spartel and that same thing could very well have had the same effect for many islands in that area. The other interesting part with the story of Spartel island is that the water there is very shallow, as the island's highest peak is just 56 meters bel...

Plato, in his story of Atlantis, says that ships from all over the world were visiting the busy port of Atlantis in order to trade. Skeptics find this idea of primitive seafaring absurd and, for them, it is one more reason why Atlantis could never have existed. Archaeological findings in the areas of Plakias and Preveli of Crete, attributed to Homo Heidelbergensis and Homo Erectus, show that these two species had reached Crete by sea 130.000 to 700.000 years ago . The Paleolithic positions which were investigated were in caves that at that time were coastal. It is worth noting here that Crete has been an island for the past 5 million years and it was also quite far from the nearest land. The sea level might have been lower back then compared to today, but the sea is so deep in that area that the change in sea level does not have such a great effect on the distance from Peloponnese (the nearest Greek mainland) to Crete. And while there are a couple of islands (Kythera and Antikythera) i...

According to Plato, Athens was once very different than today, and even than his own time. He describes in Critias how Attica had a very different morphology 9.000 years before his time (thus around 9.500 BC). Here is the ancient text: "But because there were many cataclysms during the nine thousand years – that is how many have passed until today – the soil during those years and due to those events was moving away from higher grounds and did not accumulate on the ground, as it happens in other places, but it always slipped away in large quantities and disappeared into the depths of the sea. This way, as it happens on small islands, what is left, compared to what there was in the past, resembles a skeleton of a sick body, as the soil, being fertile and soft, was carried away and only the shallow crust of the earth was left behind. But during those ancient times our land, as it was still intact, instead of mountains and the nowadays dry lands had tall muddy hills, and those plains...